Benvenuto! Puoi oppure iscriverti al bollettino email settimanale
Connessione Salva password

Nuova registrazione Password dimenticata?

AngloNoise L’Osangelino Riviu’. Seinfeld 1 – Juno 0

di man of the valley, 24 Febbraio 2008 permalink stampa

Fra tre ore inizia il rito annuale della religione mondialmente più seguita. Abbiamo chiesto al nostro corrispondente un'opinione. Ci ha mandato la recensione del movie (oops, film) che, gli è piaciuto di meno fra i grandi favoriti.

Per pudicizia gli abbiamo concesso un temporaneo anonimato. È scritto in inglese perché non v'è evidenza che l'autore (nonostante gli anni di liceo) sappia affabulare in italiano elevato abbastanza per cotanto pubblico.

Così inauguriamo anche una nuova sezione di nFA. Fu pensata per mettere in inglese le cose più tecniche; è finita in mano a Hollywood, come tutto il resto per altro. O tempora, o mores.

"Cute”. That seemed to be the word for Juno. Almost every person I had talked to or heard talking about the movie inevitably, at one moment or other of their unanimously positive review, had fallen on the word “cute”. I couldn’t help but be intrigued by the widespread agreement of so many different people. Why did 20 year old Californian/Russian Jewish boys, 50 year old Italian mothers and everyone in between spontaneously use this same word? I decided to watch the movie and see if I were overwhelmed by the cuteness as well.

Not so much…

The Plot: A 16 year old girl (Juno MacGuff, played by Ellen Page) gets pregnant and decides to give the child up for adoption to a seemingly lovely couple (Mark and Vanessa Loring, respectively played by Jason Bateman and Jennifer Garner.) However Mark gets cold feet, divorces and disappears without wanting anything to do with the baby. In the end, Juno and Vanessa complete the transaction on their own.

The Twist: Mark, who at first we think is a good guy with dreams and passion, similar in many ways to Juno herself, turns out to be an insecure mid to late thirty year old who wishes he was still twenty. On the other hand, Vanessa, whom we thought was a manipulative bitch who would have been a horrible mother, is actually a loving and caring person who will surely be a terrific mother for the poor merchandise sitting in Juno’s belly. What a twist!

The Moral: Don’t judge a book by its cover. It’s OK to be weird, everybody is. Blah blah love people for who they are blah blah.

I’m not sure what the most annoying aspect of the 91 minutes was. Maybe the trendy, “rotten-tomatoes” reading viewers surrounding me, who were well instructed that this was a “hip and hilarious” movie that would make them “laugh deeply” and did everything they could to prove the reviews right, even if that implied laughing at the most predictably obnoxious one-liners that usually didn’t consist of an actual joke, but rather the use of some unusual word such as “shenanigans” or “homeskillet”.

Or maybe it was the fact that this supposedly “independent” movie was produced by Fox Searchlight pictures among others and has already grossed, in the US alone, $110,263,000 as of Feb. 3 2008. I was unable to find the marketing cost for this movie, but I’m positive that it was much more than the reported 7.5 million of production cost given that every single time I’ve turned the TV on in the past couple of months I was forced to suffer a “Juno” commercial.

It might also be the forced grunge/alternative feel of the entire film (2 or 3 scenes between Juno and Mark consisted in nothing else but an exchange of alternative-semi-underground movie titles, comics and bands,) which was hypocritically squashed by the very suburban soccer-mom-like pro-life message, proudly paraded by Su-Chin’s: “All babies want to get borned! All babies want to get borned!” I would like to take a moment and go over Juno’s reason to not get an abortion: Su-Chin tells her fetuses have nails, the lady at the clinics counter offers her a flavored condom, and the waiting room smelled like a dentist’s office …

On the other hand, it might have been the irrelevant absurdities scattered throughout the movie that were bizarre, simply for the desire to be bizarre, not because they actually meant anything. I.E.: Every now and then Juno pretends to smoke a pipe … The track team seems to be running in the background of almost every outdoor shot … Juno’s step mother has an obsession with dogs … her step sister is named Liberty Bell …This seemingly random absurdity wasn’t even particularly funny. If you are interested in Absurdity that is actually pretty funny and even has some meaning within the context of the story; check out any episode of Will and Grace. Particularly the scenes between Jack and Karen.

It could perhaps be the transparency of the Oscar nominated writing, which seemed an exercise in using the Thesaurus. Or maybe it can be the fact that this film has been actually nominated for four Oscars: best film, best director, best lead actress and best screenplay. Keep in mind the Coen Brothers comedic masterpiece “The Big Lebowski” was nominated for: nothing… The list of comedies much superior to “Juno” which got less recognition is long and includes movies such as: “Good Morning Vietnam” “About Schmidt” “Animal House” and “The Blues Brothers”.

Ellen Page: Best Actress. I understand the role calls for: super cool girl who handles teenage pregnancy like a forty year old mother of seven. But I didn’t see a single muscle in her face move until she was giving birth. She cried twice. Which were the two only moments she didn’t deliver the lines with a flat monotonous tone. If the total lack of mobility was there for comedic effect (you know, tell a joke with stone cold seriousness and the joke is even funnier) then check out David Hyde Pierce in his role in “Frasier”, which he played for 11 years not 91 minutes. But he’s one in a lot. Ellen Page is not. If she deserved a best actress nomination, then Michael Cera (Juno’s boyfriend and father of the unwanted child) deserved a best supporting actor nomination because, frankly, he was much more entertaining to watch.

Diablo Cody: Best screenplay. These are some memorable quotes from this fantastic magnum opus…

Juno MacGuff: I could like, have this baby and give it to someone who like totally needs it.
Leah: You should look in the PennySaver.
Juno MacGuff: They have ads for parents?
Leah: Yeah! 'Desperately Seeking Spawn.'

Or

Punk Receptionist: Would you like a free condom? They're boysenberry.
Juno MacGuff: No, thanks. I'm off sex right now.
Punk Receptionist: My boyfriend wears them every time we have intercourse, it makes his junk smell like pie.

Here are some memorable quotes from the television sitcom “Friends”…

Ross: I would date her but there is a big age difference.
Joey: Well think about it when you're 90...
Ross: I know, she'll be 80 and it won't be such a big difference.
Joey: No. What I was gonna say is when you're 90 you'll still have the memory of what it was like to be with a 20-year-old.

Or

Ross: I figured after work, I'd pick up a bottle of wine, go over there, and try to... woo her.

Chandler: Hey, you know what you should do? Take her back to the 1800's when that phrase was last used.

Friends ran for 238, 30 minute episodes. That’s 7140 minutes. Juno was 91 minutes. The quality of the dialogue between the two is virtually the same…

Jason Reitman: Best Direction. I don’t even know where to begin with this one. I didn’t notice any outstanding artistry in the storytelling. In fact, it was pretty bland and conventional. During every scene change I could picture the script: Fade out. Cut to next scene. Fade out. Cut to next scene. … He obviously didn’t do much with the actors because they all sounded and acted pretty much the same: flat, and there weren’t any mesmerizing shots or sequences.

Juno: Best Film. Well, I figure that’s simply a trickling effect of the fact that the screen play, the lead actress and the director were nominated. To think that it’s in the same list of nominees as “There Will Be Blood” and “No Country For Old Men” is baffling, to say the least.

Why people like Juno: It is incredibly one dimensional and simple, like any Hollywood blockbuster action movie. However, it lacks the action part, therefore, your regular moviegoer thinks it’s deeper (whereas all that it is, is much cheaper to produce.) Because it is so simple, the same moviegoer needs to put absolutely no effort in following the film and understanding it. Conclusion: Our moviegoer feels like he’s just followed and understood a “film” as opposed to the usual action movie he watches, therefore that “film” must be a good one. In fact, not only did he follow it, but he was actually able to somehow predict the twists of the “film”. Basically Juno is a crowd pleaser. It makes the viewer feel good about himself because he thinks he has been able to follow and successfully predict a “film”, as opposed to a movie. That’s unheard of: a movie, sorry, “film” that makes you feel good about yourself and your mo… ”film” predicting abilities? The icing on the cake is that the same moviegoer doesn’t recognize any of the names of the actors (except for those who follow the gossip columns and know about Bennifer.) All the pros of an action movie without any of the cons.

 

My suggestion: Turn your TV on at any time of the day or night and you will be sure to find one of the following shows - Seinfeld, Frasier, Friends, Will and Grace, Everybody Loves Raymond, Cheers, Roseanne - airing.

Watch it; you’ll get much more out of it than spending 11 bucks on Juno.

 

Collegamenti con altri articoli: cinema
Condividi questo articolo:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • facebook
  • Google bookmarks
  • OKNO
  • Reddit
  • Segnalo
  • Technorati
  • wikio
  • Yahoo MyWeb
  • ZicZac
(utilizzi qualche altro sito di social bookmarking? faccelo sapere)
Segnala questo articolo a:
- mittente: email del mittente:
9 commenti
Per commentare devi registrarti e connetterti

Nota: i commenti sono di proprieta' degli autori, che ne sono responsabili.

Legenda: Espandi/nascondi commento Espandi/nascondi risposte Mostra origine Permalink Rss delle risposte

Rss dei commenti

  di alberto bisin, 24 Febbraio 2008, 23:45 permalink rss
Caro Osangelino, ti scrivo in italiano che lo so che lo capisci.  A me e' piaciuto Juno, ma questo e' irrilevante, e i tuoi argomenti sono esilaranti e solidi. Un po' unfair pero',  forse,   comparare Juno a Seinfeld. Sono solo io a considerare le sitcoms uno dei (pochi?) grandi contributi dell'Amerika alla cultura mondiale, assieme al Jazz? (The jury is still out on rap!) E Seinfeld come la migliore sitcom di tutti i tempi? Davvero guarderesti Will and Grace, piuttosto che Juno?
| |  
  di pietro X, 25 Febbraio 2008, 12:40 permalink rss

non sei l'unico. I am in too.

Seinfeld best ever? Surely all-time-top-five

| |  
  di alberto bisin, 25 Febbraio 2008, 06:33 permalink rss
Il nostro Osangelino la sa lunga. Oh se la sa lunga il nostro Osangelino: nulla a Juno stasera. Complimenti.
| |  
  di Luigi Pisano, 25 Febbraio 2008, 11:00 permalink rss
Credo che qualcosa abbia preso: "original screenplay", per esempio
| |  
  di alberto bisin, 25 Febbraio 2008, 14:21 permalink rss
Deve essere stato in un momento in cui ho cambiato sulla Domenica Sportiva.
| |  
  di Luigi Pisano, 25 Febbraio 2008, 15:09 permalink rss
:o)
| |  
  di nicola lacetera, 25 Febbraio 2008, 19:38 permalink rss

mah, non e' chiaro che cosa ci sia di male o scadente in pleasing the crowd. E non c'e' niente di male a essere cute, per un film.

per una recensione secondo me piu' "on point": http://movies.nytimes.com/2007/12/05/movies/05juno.html

 

saluti

 

PS: forse il fatto di averlo visto il giorno prima che e' nata mia figlia influisce sul mio giudizio molto positivo sul film. 

| |  
  di Angelo Mele, 26 Febbraio 2008, 04:18 permalink rss
Appena visto. Cute.
| |  
  di carmine, 21 Aprile 2008, 16:22 permalink rss

Mi ricordo di aver letto un brano molto bello alle superiori che terminava cosi: "Solo ora, a distanza di tempo, capisco". 

Solo ora, dopo aver visto Juno ieri sera, non solo capisco ma condivido quanto scritto ... soprattutto il consiglio finale. Almeno io ho buttato via solo 2 dollari per il noleggio (oltre che due ore del mio preziosissimo tempo!).

P.S. L'interpretazione di Ellen Page mi ha fatto ricordare un po' quella di Catalina Sandino Moreno (attrice principale di "Maria full of grace") vincitrice dell'orso d'argento a Berlino ma che, a mio parere, era poco convincente ... il film invece mi era piaciuto abbastanza.  

| |  

Creative Commons License

©Copyright 2006-2008 noiseFromAmeriKa.org

I contenuti di noiseFromAmeriKa.org sono riproducibili a norma della licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 3.0
anche senza il consenso di noiseFromAmeriKa.org, seguendo le indicazioni aggiuntive elencate in questa pagina

Queste pagine sono generate da Xaraya, un software libero, a codice aperto e gratuito